Printable List of County Offices (PDF)
to the vulnerability of Alabama to hurricanes and their potential to cause
widespread damage due to high winds and flooding, disaster preparedness is
essential for livestock operations. Advanced planning can help producers
minimize the loss of animal lives and the health problems associated with
disasters. Although help may be available from many sources following a
disaster, producers themselves are ultimately responsible for the welfare of
their animals and should prepare accordingly. At the end of the attached Timely Information Bulletin is a checklist for livestock producers to consider when preparing for a potential disaster such as a hurricane.
Timely Information - Disaster Preparation for Livestock Operations.pdf
This information sheet provides an overview of considerations for beef producers who may retain ownership or receive calves for a preconditioning phase prior to marketing.
Preconditioning Beef Calves.pdf
Warm-Season Baleage Research TI Sheet - Hargaden.pdf
Potomac Horse Fever (PHF) was originally identified in the late 1970's as a disease affecting horses in the eastern United States near the Potomac River. However, since then, the disease has been diagnosed in other locations in the United States and Canada, but never in Alabama until recently. This summer, PHF was diagnosed in Alabama horses that had not travelled to regions typically associated with PHF, indicating natural transmission of the disease in Alabama. Potomac Horse Fever is a potentially fatal disease for horses, but is curable if treated early. The attached Timely Information Bulletin contains additional information about PHF to help protect horses from this potentially deadly disease.
Timely Information - Potomac Horse Fever recently diagnosed in Alabama.pdf
This publication provides information on dicamba drift in row crops.
Information Sheet Provided by: Dr. Joyce Treadaway
Timely Information Engenia number 12 updated.pdf
There are 16 essential plant nutrients for plant growth. Some of those nutrients are derived from the environment such as Hydrogen, Carbon and Oxygen. Then there are the macro nutrients which are used in much larger amounts such as Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium. The micro nutrients, which are used in very small amounts in plant growth and development, are Iron, Manganese, Boron, Chlorine, Copper, Zinc and Molybdenum. Lastly, there are the secondary nutrients used in moderate amounts, Magnesium, Calcium and Sulfur. Sulfur is often overlooked because many have adopted the practice of adding Sulfur to the fertility program when fertilizing Cotton. Sulfur deficiency is recognizable by the yellowing of younger leaves while older foliage maintains its deep green color.
Read more about sulfur requirements in cotton and management of sulfur deficiencies in the attached timely information sheet.
Sulfur in Cotton TI.pdf
Target spot is a common and sometimes damaging disease of cotton. In field trials at the Gulf Coast Research and Extension Center (GCREC), yield losses up to 400 pounds of lint per acre of have recorded on the target spot susceptible variety Phytogen 499 WRF. The majority of other commercial cotton varieties from Deltapine, Phytogen, and Stoneville/Fibermax have partial disease resistance, thereby making them less prone to significant yield loss than Phytogen 499 WRF as well as fail to respond to fungicide inputs. Other varieties that have suffered significant but smaller target spot-incited yield losses when compared with Phytogen 499 WRF include Deltapine 1252 B2RF and Fibermax 1944 GLB2. Factors increasing the risk of damaging target spot outbreaks include excessive nitrogen fertilization and irrigation coupled with frequent July and August showers, while dry and hot weather during this same period will slow and in some cases prevent disease development. Target spot damage is much more likely in cotton grown across the southern third of Alabama and adjacent counties in the Florida Panhandle. While significant defoliation is sometimes seen in Central AL cotton, yield losses have not been as consistent nor as high as those observed further south, particularly in SW AL. To date, target spot defoliation in North AL irrigated cotton has been minimal and yield impacts negligible. Fungicides,
which delay target spot-incited defoliation, can reduce disease-related yield
loss. The best yield protection with
fungicides has been seen in Coastal and South AL in intensively managed
cotton. High risk fields in Central AL but
not North AL occasionally benefited from protective fungicide treatments. Given the relatively slim profit margin for
cotton, fungicides are a costly input that should only be considered in
high-yield (2.5+ bale/A) potential cotton in high risk settings. Sizable yield gains from fungicide inputs are
unlikely in cotton, particularly outside of SW AL, with a yield potential below
2 bales/A. The most consistent yield gains have been obtained with Priaxor followed by Headline, Quadris, Twinline, Elatus, and Topguard. Application rate does not greatly impact the efficacy of any of the above fungicides.
2017 Target Spot Fungicide Options TI REV.pdf
While cotton planting for the 2017 crop season is winding down, more work is in store for producers. Sidedress applications will soon need to be applied. For more information about nutrient application timing, see the attached article.
cotton sidedress time - W Birdsong 2017 TI.pdf
Fungicides compared for the Control of Southern Rust and Yield Response in Late-Planted Irrigated Corn
June 12, 2017 PP-775
A. K. Hagan
Extension Plant Pathology and Professor
Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, AL 36849
Southern rust (Puccinia polysora) poses a significant threat to corn in the southern third of Alabama, particularly in Baldwin and Mobile Co. Yield gains from fungicide inputs have exceeded 80 bu/A under severe rust pressure in late-planted irrigated corn in screening trials at the Gulf Coast Research and Extension Center (GCREC) in Fairhope, AL. Destructive southern rust outbreaks occur every three to four years in Southwest AL, with disease onset typically occurring at tasseling or silking in outbreak years. The risk of damaging rust outbreaks in corn declines with increasing distance from the Gulf of Mexico. The later in the corn growth cycle that southern rust appears, particularly at the dough stage, the less likely that this disease will adversely impact yield. Double crop corn sown behind early corn or wheat in South AL is particularly vulnerable to southern rust as inoculum pressure is often be very high in July and August. Regardless of the planting date, rapid disease development and subsequent yield losses are also more likely in irrigated than dryland corn. Frequent showers coupled with weather systems moving from Mexico or Florida over the Gulf of Mexico accelerates disease onset and development.
So far, low levels of southern rust have been found in corn at the GCREC but not yet at other Alabama locations. Frequent showers over the past few weeks along with continued rain showers in the extended 10-day forecast should favor continued rust spread and intensification in SW AL. In addition to southern rust, noticeable common rust development was noted in the lower and mid-canopy on corn at the GCREC and to a lesser extent at Brewton Agricultural Research Unit (BARU) in Brewton, AL, Wiregrass Research and Extension Center (WGREC) in Headland, AL and Plant Breeding Unit (PBU), Tallassee, AL. Also, Northern corn leaf blight and southern leaf spot disease along with gray leaf spot have been diagnosed on in corn variety trials at either BARU, GCREC, and PBU. While common rust rarely causes sufficient damage to reduce corn yield, Northern and Southern corn leaf blight along with gray leaf spot can negatively impact corn yield.
Should a southern rust outbreak occur, protective fungicides are key to slowing disease progress and protecting kernel yield. Based on previous Alabama field trials, sizable yield gains from fungicide inputs are realized only when serious damage attributed to either southern rust or Northern corn leaf blight develops on the ear and ear-1 leaves. When there is little or no disease activity, no yield gains from fungicide inputs will be realized. All corn fields are not candidates for fungicide treatments. Name-brand fungicides at $20 to $30 per acre are fairly costly and producers are likely to see good returns on their fungicide investment in irrigated or dryland fields with yield potentials exceeding 175 to 200 bu/A, particularly with corn prices near the $4 per bu mark. Ideally, fungicide treatments should be initiated for rust control based on a scouting report(s) and corn growth stage with a two-application program at growth stage VT-R1 and R2-R3 when disease pressure is high and weather favorable for further disease intensification.
The objective of this multi-year study at BARU was to assess the efficacy of registered fungicides for the control of southern rust and yield response of late-planted, irrigated corn.
The study site at the Brewton Agricultural Research Unit (BARU) was prepared for planting with a disk harrow and finished with a ripper bedder. A broadcast pre-plant application of 25 to 51 lb actual nitrogen/A fertilizer supplemented with 10% sulfur was followed with two or three topdress applications of a total of 200 lb actual nitrogen/A. Pioneer 2023YHR, Pioneer 1637YHR, and DeKalb 62-08 Smart Stax field corn was sown at a rate of 2 seed/row-ft (29,120 seed/A) during the first week of May in 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively. Weed control was provided by an at-plant application of 1.33 pt/A Dual Magnum II followed by a post emergent application of 0.5 gal/A Atrazine + 1 pt/A Dual Magnum II. Plots were irrigated as needed to maintain optimum crop development with a lateral irrigation system. A factorial design with study year as the whole plot and fungicide program was used. Individual experimental units consisted of four, 25-foot rows on 3-foot centers in four replications. A non-fungicide treated control was included. Fungicides were broadcast with a 'high-boy' sprayer with TX-12 nozzles spaced 19 inches apart mounted on a four row boom in 15 gal/A of spray volume at 40 psi at growth stage (GS) VT (tasseling) – R1 (silking) on July 8 and GS R2 (kernel blister) – R3 (milk). Induce non-ionic surfactant at 0.125% v/v was added to all fungicide tank mixtures. Southern rust was assessed at GS R6 (black layer) on a scale of 1 to 11 where 1 = no disease, 2 = 1 to 10%, 3 = 11 to 20%, 4 = 21 to 30%, 5 = 31 to 40%, etc. of leaf area diseased on 5 ear leaves in each plot just prior to black layer. Plots were combined on September 12. Yields are reported at 15.5% moisture. Statistical analyses for southern rust intensity were done on rank transformations of data. For presentation, data are back transformed. Means for all variables were separated using Fisher's least significant difference (LSD) test (P<0.05).
Southern rust severity significantly differed by study year and fungicide program (Table 1). For all fungicide programs, southern rust intensity ratings were higher in 2014 than either of the following study years (Fig. 1). With the exception of the non-fungicide treated control, Quilt Xcel and Aproach fb Aproach Prima programs, lower rust ratings were observed in 2016 than 2015. Noticeable better southern rust control was provided by Stratego YLD and Fortix in 2015 and 2016 as compared with 2014 when both products proved less efficacious against this disease than Aproach fb Aproach Prima, Priaxor, and Quilt Xcel. The latter three fungicide programs consistently gave effective disease control, particularly Quilt Xcel under severe disease pressure in 2014. The two least effective fungicides for controlling southern rust in corn were Tilt 3.6E and Muscle 3.6F. While the Muscle 3.6F-treated corn reduced rust severity compared with the non-fungicide treated control in two of three years, this fungicide failed to match the efficacy of Aproach fb Aproach Prima, Priaxor, and Quilt Xcel. When compared with the non-fungicide treated control, Tilt 3.6F failed to reduce southern rust severity in two of three study years and was the least efficacious fungicide program in 2015.
Table 1. P values for generalized linear mixed models for effects of year and fungicide treatment on southern rust severity, test weights, and yield of corn.
Z Significance of F values at the 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 levels is indicated by *, **, or ***, respectively.
Figure 1. Southern rust severity as influenced by fungicide program. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly difference according to Fisher's protected least significance (LSD) test (P<0.05).
Yield significantly differed for all fungicide programs by study year (Table 1). The greatest yield differentials between the non-treated control and the superior fungicide program(s) was noted in 2014 and 2015 when a 50 and 65 bu/A yield gain, respectively, was obtained with Quilt Xcel (Fig. 2). Yield gains from fungicide inputs was lower in 2016 due to reduced disease severity compared with the previous two study years. When compared with the non-fungicide treated control, significant yield gains were obtained in all study years with Aproach/Aproach Prima, Fortix, Priaxor, and Quilt Xcel, as compared with two of three years with Stratego YLD and one of three years with Tilt 3.6E and Muscle 3.6E. In all study years, greater yields were recorded for Quilt Xcel than for Muscle 3.6E, Stratego YLD, and Tilt 3.6E. Priaxor-treated corn also produced greater yields than Muscle 3.6E and Tilt 3.6E in all study years and Stratego YLD in one of three study years. Aproach/Aproach Prima and Fortix programs matched the yields obtained with Quilt Xcel in 2016 but not 2014 or 2015 under elevated disease pressure. Overall, the poorest yield response was recorded for Tilt 3.6E and Muscle 3.6E as neither of these fungicides were able to match the performance of the above fungicides in at least two of three study years.
Figure 2. Yield response to fungicide inputs by study year. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly difference according to Fisher's protected least significance (LSD) test (P<0.05).
As the results of this study demonstrate, southern rust, particularly under favor weather patterns for disease development, can drastically reduce corn yields. When compared with Quilt Xcel, yield for the non-fungicide treated control was reduced up to 60 bu/A for a farm gate income loss of $240 per acre at current contract prices. Yield losses up to 80 bu/A have previously been recorded in previous fungicide screening trials in Alabama.
The fungicides screened are among many but not all of the products currently recommended for the control of Southern rust and other foliar diseases in corn. Of the fungicides screened, Quilt Xcel followed by Priaxor, Fortix, and Aproach/Aproach Prime provided the most consistently effective southern rust control. That high level of disease control was reflected in the sizable yield gains obtained with the two former and to a lesser extent the latter two fungicides in all study years. The generic fungicides Tilt 3.6E (propiconazole) and Muscle 3.6E (tebuconazole) are considerably less expensive than the above name- brand fungicides but proved to have limited activity against southern rust and often failed to boost yields as compared with Quilt Xcel, Priaxor, Fortix, and Aproach/Aproach Prima. As a result of this and previous Alabama fungicide screening trials, the use of Tilt 3.6E and Muscle 3.6F for southern control in corn should be avoided. In contrast, the name-brand fungicides in general and Quilt Xcel and Priaxor in particular gave effective rust control over the three-year study period that was backed up with consistently high yields.
2017 Corn Fungicide TI.rev.pdf
Currently, much of Alabama is either abnormally dry, in a moderate drought, or in a severe drought. As we have had to deal with drought conditions way too often in recent years, longer-term forecasts predict dry to droughty conditions will persist for much of Alabama throughout 2017. Hopefully that will not be the case, but if it is, making plans now to deal with potentially limited feed, forage, and water conditions could pay dividends down the road. In an effort to provide adequate supplies of feed, forage, and/or water, some options to consider include:
Timely Information - Culling strategies for beef cattle operations.pdf
Copyright © 1997 -
2017 by theAlabama Cooperative Extension System
Alabama A&M University and
All Rights Reserved. – firstname.lastname@example.org
Legal Disclaimer – Privacy Statement